[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PA4PR04MB96405138465D215C34285F02894B9@PA4PR04MB9640.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:22:51 +0000
From: Jun Li <jun.li@....com>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
CC: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] usb: chipidea: imx: support disabling runtime-pm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2023 6:18 PM
> To: Jun Li <jun.li@....com>
> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> festevam@...il.com; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org;
> robh+dt@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de; shawnguo@...nel.org;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>; Francesco Dolcini
> <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>; Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] usb: chipidea: imx: support disabling runtime-pm
>
> Hello Jun,
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2023 15:17:56 +0200
> Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Jun, Francesco,
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2023 13:17:11 +0200
> > Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 09:02:39AM +0000, Jun Li wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 7:00 PM
> > > > > To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>; Jun Li
> <jun.li@....com>
> > > > > Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > festevam@...il.com; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org;
> kernel@...gutronix.de;
> > > > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@....com>;
> > > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > peter.chen@....com; robh+dt@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de;
> > > > > shawnguo@...nel.org; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>;
> > > > > Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] usb: chipidea: imx: support disabling
> runtime-pm
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 5 May 2023 09:49:16 +0000
> > > > > > Jun Li <jun.li@....com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Is your board design similar like Francesco's as below?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Possibly, but I'm afraid I can't say: I am using the Toradex Colibri
> > > > > > i.MX6ULL SoM, whose schematics are not public.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can confirm that it's the same.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Francesco for the confirmation, had a check with design team,
> > > > there is no status bit which can be used to judge the VDD_USB_CAP is
> > > > powered or not, so we have to add a board level dts property to tell
> > > > this usb phy driver to bypass MXS_PHY_DISCONNECT_LINE_WITHOUT_VBUS.
> > > >
> > > > Before send a formal patch, I want to confirm this should work for
> your
> > > > HW design, like below simple hack:
> > >
> > > Thanks Li Jun, I tested it with v6.3.1 kernel and it's all good.
> > > I would be happy to test the patch as soon as you send it.
> >
> > Thanks Jun, it works here as well, on 6.1.27!
>
> Have you managed to make progress on the patch after Francesco's and my
> tests?
>
> As I see it, a proper fix for mainline could be as simple as a new DT
> property to describe this specific hardware configuration and a patch
> to ignore the flag when the property is present. Is my understanding
> correct?
Yes, your understanding is correct, talked with Xu(in CC), he will take this
soon.
Thanks
Li Jun
>
> Best regards,
> Luca
>
> --
> Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbootl
> in.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cjun.li%40nxp.com%7C54d7d4bc194545db610608db602
> e0ca6%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638209523121178887%7
> CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1h
> aWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3SbXTUvvRwcsJoBIhPoypWDLDMpj2m
> z09JC34t3rNh4%3D&reserved=0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists