[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f63dd13-f69a-8171-90f7-5a4f46ed5790@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 14:26:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, cocci@...ia.fr,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [cocci] [PATCH] Coccinelle: kmerr: increase check list
On Tue, 30 May 2023, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/null/kmerr.cocci
> …
> > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ position any withtest.p;
> > identifier f;
> > @@
> >
> > -x@p1 = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\)(...);
> > +x@p1 = \(kmalloc\|devm_kmalloc\|kmalloc_array\|devm_kmalloc_array\|krealloc_array\|kzalloc\|devm_kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kcalloc\|kasprintf\|devm_kasprintf\|kstrdup\|kstrdup_const\)(...);
> > ...
> > x1@p = f@p2(...);
> > if (!x1) S
>
> Can it be nicer to specify desired function names on multiple lines
> for such a SmPL disjunction?
>
> Would you sort them according to their call probability?
Please don't follow either of these suggestions.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists