linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: es8316: Increment max value for ALC Capture Target Volume control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d15fb475-07da-4273-8a4b-2b493f3feb4d@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 13:55:16 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Zhu Ning <zhuning0077@...il.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        David Yang <yangxiaohua@...rest-semi.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: es8316: Increment max value for ALC Capture
 Target Volume control

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:52:52PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On 5/30/23 14:36, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The other option would be to change the value in the register during
> > probe to one that's in range, that wouldn't stop any existing saved
> > settings from generating errors but would mean there wouldn't be any new
> > ones.  Either approach is probably fine.

> Thanks, I will prepare v2 and keep the current approach.

OK.  Remember that the TLV will need to be updated to show the two
values having identical effect.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)