[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b4eff36-28db-5880-3094-efa491a69dc7@starfivetech.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 10:37:50 +0800
From: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
CC: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: Add starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx
On 2023/5/29 22:05, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Changhuang,
>
> Couple of minor bits from me here, you don't need to fix them unless
> the binding has to change for other reasons.
>
Thanks for your comments.
[...]
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: StarFive SoC MIPI D-PHY Rx Controller
>
> nit: either s/SoC/JH7110/ or s/SoC//.
>
Changed to "StarFive JH7110 SoC MIPI D-PHY Rx Controller"?
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>
>> + - Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com>
>> +
>> +description:
>> + The StarFive SoC uses the MIPI CSI D-PHY based on M31 IP to transfer
>> + CSI camera data.
>
> nit: "Starfive SoCs contain a MIPI CSI D-PHY based on an M31 IP, used to
> transfer CSI camera data."
>
Will fixed this.
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + const: starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx
[...]
>> + resets:
>> + items:
>> + - description: DPHY_HW reset
>> + - description: DPHY_B09_ALWAYS_ON reset
>
> I'd prefer not to have what looks like copy-paste from a datasheet
> and instead a description of what they do.
>
> Otherwise, this looks grand to me, but I don't understand the hardware
> so there is no point in me leaving an R-b on this.
> Hopefully Krzysztof can take a look at it in the coming days.
>
I will wait for Krzysztof's comments.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists