[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34864c2f-dbe2-8598-ad4c-f9c3acc13164@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:14:03 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, soc@...nel.org
Cc: conor@...nel.org, corbet@....net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
olof@...om.net, palmer@...belt.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/process: add soc maintainer handbook
On 30/05/2023 14:49, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Arnd suggested that adding a maintainer handbook for the SoC "subsystem"
> would be helpful in trying to bring on board maintainers for the various
> new platforms cropping up in RISC-V land.
>
> Add a document briefly describing the role of the SoC subsystem and some
> basic advice for (new) platform maintainers.
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - add Krzysztof's suggested method for avoiding inter-branch
> dependencies
> - explicitly mention that tags should be signed
> - link to the devicetree abi document, rather than trying to explain it
> here & reword that whole section
> - fix some typos, capitalisation & unify bullet style
>
> The devicetree abi doc feels quite out of date at this point, and could
> probably do with a spring clean - but it also feels like hallowed groun
Yep, but that's another topic.
> d
> on which one should tread lightly, so I won't go near that til Rob is
> back.
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists