linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] rust: workqueue: add safe API to workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 10:23:08 -0300
From:   Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
To:     Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
        Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc:     alex.gaynor@...il.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
        bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ojeda@...nel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] rust: workqueue: add safe API to workqueue

On 5/30/23 04:19, Andreas Hindborg wrote:> I prefer the first one, but both look OK to me. Is one more idiomatic
> than the other, or is it just a matter of personal preference?

Pedantic Clippy will deny a boolean match and I prefer if-else over it
because the latter it's explicitly purposed for boolean control flow.