[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230531-49ed4c2054db0abbacd03632@orel>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:09:28 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] drivers: perf: Rename riscv pmu driver
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> In addition to being more pretty, it will be useful in upcoming commits
> to distinguish those pmu drivers from the other pmu drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_legacy.c | 2 +-
> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_legacy.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_legacy.c
> index 0d8c9d8849ee..ffe09d857366 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_legacy.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_legacy.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void pmu_legacy_init(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> pmu->ctr_clear_idx = NULL;
> pmu->ctr_read = pmu_legacy_read_ctr;
>
> - perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
> + perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, RISCV_PMU_LEGACY_PDEV_NAME, PERF_TYPE_RAW);
> }
>
> static int pmu_legacy_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 70cb50fd41c2..3b0ee2148054 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto out_unregister;
>
> - ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
> + ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, RISCV_PMU_PDEV_NAME, PERF_TYPE_RAW);
Should we include "sbi" in this name?
> if (ret)
> goto out_unregister;
>
> --
> 2.37.2
>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists