[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023053119-drab-cartwheel-29af@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:34:02 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] serial: bflb_uart: add Bouffalolab UART Driver
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:09:56PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:36:00AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:22:38PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Add the driver for Bouffalolab UART IP which is found in Bouffalolab
> > > SoCs such as bl808.
> >
> > New uarts are being created that are NOT 8250-like? Why????
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure I understand your meaning. I guess you mean writing the new
> uart driver following 8250 style. And the latest example is
> sunplus-uart.c, it can be used as an example how to write a 8250 style
> driver for new non-8250 uart IP.
No, I mean, "why are hardware designers creating new UARTs in 2023 that
are NOT 8250-based"? Why do they want to constantly reinvent the wheel?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists