linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/sched: cls_u32: Fix reference counter leak leading to overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 11:05:25 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/sched: cls_u32: Fix reference counter leak
 leading to overflow

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:16 AM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> In the event of a failure in tcf_change_indev(), u32_set_parms() will
> immediately return without decrementing the recently incremented
> reference counter.  If this happens enough times, the counter will
> rollover and the reference freed, leading to a double free which can be
> used to do 'bad things'.
>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org # v4.14+
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> ---
>  net/sched/cls_u32.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_u32.c b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> index 4e2e269f121f8..fad61ca5e90bf 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> @@ -762,8 +762,11 @@ static int u32_set_parms(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
>         if (tb[TCA_U32_INDEV]) {
>                 int ret;
>                 ret = tcf_change_indev(net, tb[TCA_U32_INDEV], extack);
> -               if (ret < 0)
> +               if (ret < 0) {
> +                       if (tb[TCA_U32_LINK])
> +                               n->ht_down->refcnt--;
>                         return -EINVAL;
> +               }
>                 n->ifindex = ret;
>         }
>         return 0;

The spirit of the patch looks right I dont think this fully solves the
issue you state.
My suggestion: Move the if (tb[TCA_U32_INDEV])  above the if
(tb[TCA_U32_LINK]) {
Did you see this in practice or you found it by eyeballing the code?
Can you also add a tdc test for it? There are simple ways to create
the scenario.

cheers,
jamal
> 2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog
>