linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Notify on pte permission upgrades

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZHaVsa3oXfXqE1Pu@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2023 21:32:49 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, will@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nicolinc@...dia.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, zhi.wang.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Notify on pte permission upgrades

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:30:48AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:

> So I'd rather keep the invalidate in ptep_set_access_flags(). Would
> renaming invalidate_range() to invalidate_arch_secondary_tlb() along
> with clearing up the documentation make that more acceptable, at least
> in the short term?

Then we need to go through removing kvm first I think.

Jason