[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230531111602.7ecf401b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 11:16:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Qingfang DENG <dqfext@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@....hut.fi>,
Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Qingfang DENG <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] neighbour: fix unaligned access to pneigh_entry
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:42:33 +0800 Qingfang DENG wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> u8 key[];
> +#else
> + u8 key[] __aligned(4);
> +#endif
I'd appreciate a second opinion, but to me it's very unlikely we'd save
any memory even with efficient aligned access here. No reasonably key
will fit into 3 bytes, right? So we can as well avoid the ifdef and
make the key[] always aligned. Or preferably, if it doesn't cause
compilation issues, make the type of the key u32?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists