[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5b65c4b-7232-e5a7-27ae-b8efab037396@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 14:29:54 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@...sung.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jwook1.kim@...sung.com,
lakkyung.jung@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Optionally re-enable reader optimistic
spinning
On 5/30/23 20:34, Bongkyu Kim wrote:
> Remove reader optimistic spinning has a great regression on application
I won't consider this a great regression if it is just a few % point of
performance differences.
BTW, this patch is mostly a revert of commit 617f3ef95177
("locking/rwsem: Remove reader optimistic spinning"). So it should be
mentioned here.
> startup performance in android device. In mobile environment, reader
> optimistic spinning is still useful because there're not many readers.
> So re-enable reader optimistic spinning and disabled by default. And,
> can turn on by cmdline.
>
> Test result:
> This is 15 application startup performance in our s5e8535 soc.
> - Cortex A78*2 + Cortex A55*6
>
> Application base opt_rspin Diff Diff(%)
> -------------------- ------ --------- ---- -------
> * Total(geomean) 343 330 -13 +3.8%
> -------------------- ------ --------- ---- -------
> helloworld 110 108 -2 +1.8%
> Amazon_Seller 397 388 -9 +2.3%
> Whatsapp 311 304 -7 +2.3%
> Simple_PDF_Reader 500 463 -37 +7.4%
> FaceApp 330 317 -13 +3.9%
> Timestamp_Camera_Free 451 443 -8 +1.8%
> Kindle 629 597 -32 +5.1%
> Coinbase 243 233 -10 +4.1%
> Firefox 425 399 -26 +6.1%
> Candy_Crush_Soda 552 538 -14 +2.5%
> Hill_Climb_Racing 245 230 -15 +6.1%
> Call_Recorder 437 426 -11 +2.5%
> Color_Fill_3D 190 180 -10 +5.3%
> eToro 512 505 -7 +1.4%
> GroupMe 281 266 -15 +5.3%
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +
> kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h | 5 +-
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 292 +++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index bb23a36a7ff7..b92a6b3f965f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5495,6 +5495,8 @@
>
> rw [KNL] Mount root device read-write on boot
>
> + rwsem.opt_rspin= [KNL] Use rwsem reader optimistic spinning
> +
> S [KNL] Run init in single mode
>
> s390_iommu= [HW,S390]
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> index 97fb6f3f840a..270a0d351932 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
> @@ -56,9 +56,12 @@ LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_sleep_reader) /* # of reader sleeps */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_sleep_writer) /* # of writer sleeps */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_wake_reader) /* # of reader wakeups */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_wake_writer) /* # of writer wakeups */
> -LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_lock) /* # of opt-acquired write locks */
> +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_rlock) /* # of opt-acquired read locks */
> +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_wlock) /* # of opt-acquired write locks */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_fail) /* # of failed optspins */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_nospin) /* # of disabled optspins */
> +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_norspin) /* # of disabled reader-only optspins */
> +LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_opt_rlock2) /* # of opt-acquired 2ndary read locks */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock) /* # of read locks acquired */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock_steal) /* # of read locks by lock stealing */
> LOCK_EVENT(rwsem_rlock_fast) /* # of fast read locks acquired */
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> index 9eabd585ce7a..016dbc4312e6 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -33,13 +33,19 @@
> #include "lock_events.h"
>
> /*
> - * The least significant 2 bits of the owner value has the following
> + * The least significant 3 bits of the owner value has the following
> * meanings when set.
> * - Bit 0: RWSEM_READER_OWNED - The rwsem is owned by readers
> - * - Bit 1: RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE - Cannot spin on a reader-owned lock
> + * - Bit 1: RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE - Readers cannot spin on this lock.
> + * - Bit 2: RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE - Writers cannot spin on this lock.
> *
> - * When the rwsem is reader-owned and a spinning writer has timed out,
> - * the nonspinnable bit will be set to disable optimistic spinning.
> + * When the rwsem is either owned by an anonymous writer, or it is
> + * reader-owned, but a spinning writer has timed out, both nonspinnable
> + * bits will be set to disable optimistic spinning by readers and writers.
> + * In the later case, the last unlocking reader should then check the
> + * writer nonspinnable bit and clear it only to give writers preference
> + * to acquire the lock via optimistic spinning, but not readers. Similar
> + * action is also done in the reader slowpath.
>
> * When a writer acquires a rwsem, it puts its task_struct pointer
> * into the owner field. It is cleared after an unlock.
> @@ -59,9 +65,47 @@
> * is previously owned by a writer and the following conditions are met:
> * - rwsem is not currently writer owned
> * - the handoff isn't set.
> + *
> + * Reader optimistic spinning is helpful when the reader critical section
> + * is short and there aren't that many readers around. It makes readers
> + * relatively more preferred than writers. When a writer times out spinning
> + * on a reader-owned lock and set the nospinnable bits, there are two main
> + * reasons for that.
> + *
> + * 1) The reader critical section is long, perhaps the task sleeps after
> + * acquiring the read lock.
> + * 2) There are just too many readers contending the lock causing it to
> + * take a while to service all of them.
> + *
> + * In the former case, long reader critical section will impede the progress
> + * of writers which is usually more important for system performance. In
> + * the later case, reader optimistic spinning tends to make the reader
> + * groups that contain readers that acquire the lock together smaller
> + * leading to more of them. That may hurt performance in some cases. In
> + * other words, the setting of nonspinnable bits indicates that reader
> + * optimistic spinning may not be helpful for those workloads that cause
> + * it.
> + *
> + * Therefore, any writers that had observed the setting of the writer
> + * nonspinnable bit for a given rwsem after they fail to acquire the lock
> + * via optimistic spinning will set the reader nonspinnable bit once they
> + * acquire the write lock. Similarly, readers that observe the setting
> + * of reader nonspinnable bit at slowpath entry will set the reader
> + * nonspinnable bits when they acquire the read lock via the wakeup path.
> + *
> + * Once the reader nonspinnable bit is on, it will only be reset when
> + * a writer is able to acquire the rwsem in the fast path or somehow a
> + * reader or writer in the slowpath doesn't observe the nonspinable bit.
> + *
> + * This is to discourage reader optmistic spinning on that particular
> + * rwsem and make writers more preferred. This adaptive disabling of reader
> + * optimistic spinning will alleviate the negative side effect of this
> + * feature.
> */
> #define RWSEM_READER_OWNED (1UL << 0)
> -#define RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE (1UL << 1)
> +#define RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE (1UL << 1)
> +#define RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE (1UL << 2)
> +#define RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE (RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE | RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE)
> #define RWSEM_OWNER_FLAGS_MASK (RWSEM_READER_OWNED | RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
> @@ -127,6 +171,12 @@
> #define RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS|\
> RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF|RWSEM_FLAG_READFAIL)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> +/* Reader optimistic spinning, default disabled */
> +static bool rwsem_opt_rspin;
> +module_param_named(opt_rspin, rwsem_opt_rspin, bool, 0644);
> +#endif
The rwsem code isn't really a kernel module. It is a bit odd to use
module parameter here.
> +
> /*
> * All writes to owner are protected by WRITE_ONCE() to make sure that
> * store tearing can't happen as optimistic spinners may read and use
> @@ -171,7 +221,7 @@ static inline void __rwsem_set_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> struct task_struct *owner)
> {
> unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner | RWSEM_READER_OWNED |
> - (atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE);
> + (atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE);
>
> atomic_long_set(&sem->owner, val);
> }
> @@ -341,6 +391,7 @@ struct rwsem_waiter {
> enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
> unsigned long timeout;
> bool handoff_set;
> + unsigned long last_rowner;
> };
> #define rwsem_first_waiter(sem) \
> list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list)
> @@ -480,6 +531,10 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> * the reader is copied over.
> */
> owner = waiter->task;
> + if (waiter->last_rowner & RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE) {
> + owner = (void *)((unsigned long)owner | RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE);
> + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_norspin);
> + }
> __rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem, owner);
> }
>
> @@ -684,6 +739,30 @@ enum owner_state {
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> +/*
> + * Try to acquire read lock before the reader is put on wait queue.
> + * Lock acquisition isn't allowed if the rwsem is locked or a writer handoff
> + * is ongoing.
> + */
> +static inline bool rwsem_try_read_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +{
> + long count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
> +
> + if (count & (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))
> + return false;
> +
> + count = atomic_long_fetch_add_acquire(RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> + if (!(count & (RWSEM_WRITER_MASK | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))) {
> + rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
> + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_rlock);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + /* Back out the change */
> + atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Try to acquire write lock before the writer has been put on wait queue.
> */
> @@ -695,14 +774,15 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count,
> count | RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED)) {
> rwsem_set_owner(sem);
> - lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_lock);
> + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_wlock);
> return true;
> }
> }
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> + unsigned long nonspinnable)
> {
> struct task_struct *owner;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -721,7 +801,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> /*
> * Don't check the read-owner as the entry may be stale.
> */
> - if ((flags & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE) ||
> + if ((flags & nonspinnable) ||
> (owner && !(flags & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) && !owner_on_cpu(owner)))
> ret = false;
>
> @@ -732,9 +812,9 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> #define OWNER_SPINNABLE (OWNER_NULL | OWNER_WRITER | OWNER_READER)
>
> static inline enum owner_state
> -rwsem_owner_state(struct task_struct *owner, unsigned long flags)
> +rwsem_owner_state(struct task_struct *owner, unsigned long flags, unsigned long nonspinnable)
> {
> - if (flags & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)
> + if (flags & nonspinnable)
> return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE;
>
> if (flags & RWSEM_READER_OWNED)
> @@ -744,7 +824,7 @@ rwsem_owner_state(struct task_struct *owner, unsigned long flags)
> }
>
> static noinline enum owner_state
> -rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, unsigned long nonspinnable)
> {
> struct task_struct *new, *owner;
> unsigned long flags, new_flags;
> @@ -753,7 +833,7 @@ rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
>
> owner = rwsem_owner_flags(sem, &flags);
> - state = rwsem_owner_state(owner, flags);
> + state = rwsem_owner_state(owner, flags, nonspinnable);
> if (state != OWNER_WRITER)
> return state;
>
> @@ -766,7 +846,7 @@ rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> */
> new = rwsem_owner_flags(sem, &new_flags);
> if ((new != owner) || (new_flags != flags)) {
> - state = rwsem_owner_state(new, new_flags);
> + state = rwsem_owner_state(new, new_flags, nonspinnable);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -816,12 +896,14 @@ static inline u64 rwsem_rspin_threshold(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> return sched_clock() + delta;
> }
>
> -static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem, bool wlock)
> {
> bool taken = false;
> int prev_owner_state = OWNER_NULL;
> int loop = 0;
> u64 rspin_threshold = 0;
> + unsigned long nonspinnable = wlock ? RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE
> + : RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE;
>
> /* sem->wait_lock should not be held when doing optimistic spinning */
> if (!osq_lock(&sem->osq))
> @@ -836,14 +918,15 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> for (;;) {
> enum owner_state owner_state;
>
> - owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem);
> + owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, nonspinnable);
> if (!(owner_state & OWNER_SPINNABLE))
> break;
>
> /*
> * Try to acquire the lock
> */
> - taken = rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(sem);
> + taken = wlock ? rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(sem)
> + : rwsem_try_read_lock_unqueued(sem);
>
> if (taken)
> break;
> @@ -851,7 +934,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> /*
> * Time-based reader-owned rwsem optimistic spinning
> */
> - if (owner_state == OWNER_READER) {
> + if (wlock && (owner_state == OWNER_READER)) {
> /*
> * Re-initialize rspin_threshold every time when
> * the owner state changes from non-reader to reader.
> @@ -860,7 +943,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> * the beginning of the 2nd reader phase.
> */
> if (prev_owner_state != OWNER_READER) {
> - if (rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE))
> + if (rwsem_test_oflags(sem, nonspinnable))
> break;
> rspin_threshold = rwsem_rspin_threshold(sem);
> loop = 0;
> @@ -935,30 +1018,89 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Clear the owner's RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE bit if it is set. This should
> + * Clear the owner's RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE bit if it is set. This should
> * only be called when the reader count reaches 0.
> + *
> + * This give writers better chance to acquire the rwsem first before
> + * readers when the rwsem was being held by readers for a relatively long
> + * period of time. Race can happen that an optimistic spinner may have
> + * just stolen the rwsem and set the owner, but just clearing the
> + * RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE bit will do no harm anyway.
> */
> -static inline void clear_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +static inline void clear_wr_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> - if (unlikely(rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE)))
> - atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE, &sem->owner);
> + if (unlikely(rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE)))
> + atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE, &sem->owner);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function is called when the reader fails to acquire the lock via
> + * optimistic spinning. In this case we will still attempt to do a trylock
> + * when comparing the rwsem state right now with the state when entering
> + * the slowpath indicates that the reader is still in a valid reader phase.
> + * This happens when the following conditions are true:
> + *
> + * 1) The lock is currently reader owned, and
> + * 2) The lock is previously not reader-owned or the last read owner changes.
> + *
> + * In the former case, we have transitioned from a writer phase to a
> + * reader-phase while spinning. In the latter case, it means the reader
> + * phase hasn't ended when we entered the optimistic spinning loop. In
> + * both cases, the reader is eligible to acquire the lock. This is the
> + * secondary path where a read lock is acquired optimistically.
> + *
> + * The reader non-spinnable bit wasn't set at time of entry or it will
> + * not be here at all.
> + */
> +static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> + unsigned long last_rowner)
> +{
> + unsigned long owner = atomic_long_read(&sem->owner);
> +
> + if (!(owner & RWSEM_READER_OWNED))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (((owner ^ last_rowner) & ~RWSEM_OWNER_FLAGS_MASK) &&
> + rwsem_try_read_lock_unqueued(sem)) {
> + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_rlock2);
> + lockevent_add(rwsem_opt_fail, -1);
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool rwsem_no_spinners(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +{
> + return !osq_is_locked(&sem->osq);
> }
>
> #else
> -static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> + unsigned long nonspinnable)
> {
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +static inline bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem, bool wlock)
> {
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline void clear_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { }
> +static inline void clear_wr_nonspinnable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { }
> +
> +static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> + unsigned long last_rowner)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool rwsem_no_spinners(sem)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
>
> static inline enum owner_state
> -rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, unsigned long nonspinnable)
> {
> return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE;
> }
> @@ -984,7 +1126,7 @@ static inline void rwsem_cond_wake_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count,
> wake_type = RWSEM_WAKE_READERS;
> } else {
> wake_type = RWSEM_WAKE_ANY;
> - clear_nonspinnable(sem);
> + clear_wr_nonspinnable(sem);
> }
> rwsem_mark_wake(sem, wake_type, wake_q);
> }
> @@ -995,32 +1137,66 @@ static inline void rwsem_cond_wake_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count,
> static struct rw_semaphore __sched *
> rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int state)
> {
> - long adjustment = -RWSEM_READER_BIAS;
> + long owner, adjustment = -RWSEM_READER_BIAS;
> long rcnt = (count >> RWSEM_READER_SHIFT);
> struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
> DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
>
> /*
> * To prevent a constant stream of readers from starving a sleeping
> - * waiter, don't attempt optimistic lock stealing if the lock is
> - * currently owned by readers.
> + * waiter, don't attempt optimistic spinning if the lock is currently
> + * owned by readers.
> */
> - if ((atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) &&
> - (rcnt > 1) && !(count & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED))
> + owner = atomic_long_read(&sem->owner);
> + if ((owner & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) && (rcnt > 1) &&
> + !(count & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED))
> goto queue;
>
> /*
> - * Reader optimistic lock stealing.
> + * Reader optimistic lock stealing
> + *
> + * We can take the read lock directly without doing
> + * rwsem_optimistic_spin() if the conditions are right.
> + * Also wake up other readers if it is the first reader.
> */
> - if (!(count & (RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))) {
> + if (!(count & (RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)) &&
> + rwsem_no_spinners(sem)) {
> rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
> lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_steal);
> + if (rcnt == 1)
> + goto wake_readers;
> + return sem;
> + }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> + if (!rwsem_opt_rspin)
> + goto queue;
> +#endif
>
I would suggest changing that to
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER) || !rwsem_opt_rspin)
goto queue;
> + /*
> + * Save the current read-owner of rwsem, if available, and the
> + * reader nonspinnable bit.
> + */
> + waiter.last_rowner = owner;
> + if (!(waiter.last_rowner & RWSEM_READER_OWNED))
> + waiter.last_rowner &= RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE;
> +
> + if (!rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem, RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE))
> + goto queue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Undo read bias from down_read() and do optimistic spinning.
> + */
> + atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> + adjustment = 0;
> + if (rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem, false)) {
> + /* rwsem_optimistic_spin() implies ACQUIRE on success */
> /*
> - * Wake up other readers in the wait queue if it is
> - * the first reader.
> + * Wake up other readers in the wait list if the front
> + * waiter is a reader.
> */
> - if ((rcnt == 1) && (count & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> +wake_readers:
> + if ((atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
> rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED,
> @@ -1029,6 +1205,9 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> wake_up_q(&wake_q);
> }
> return sem;
> + } else if (rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(sem, waiter.last_rowner)) {
> + /* rwsem_reader_phase_trylock() implies ACQUIRE on success */
> + return sem;
> }
>
> queue:
> @@ -1045,7 +1224,8 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> * immediately as its RWSEM_READER_BIAS has already been set
> * in the count.
> */
> - if (!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_WRITER_MASK)) {
> + if (adjustment && !(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) &
> + RWSEM_WRITER_MASK)) {
> /* Provide lock ACQUIRE */
> smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> @@ -1058,7 +1238,10 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter);
>
> /* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
> - count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
> + if (adjustment)
> + count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
> + else
> + count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
>
> rwsem_cond_wake_waiter(sem, count, &wake_q);
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> @@ -1100,21 +1283,43 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * This function is called by the a write lock owner. So the owner value
> + * won't get changed by others.
> + */
> +static inline void rwsem_disable_reader_optspin(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> + bool disable)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(disable)) {
> + atomic_long_or(RWSEM_RD_NONSPINNABLE, &sem->owner);
> + lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_norspin);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Wait until we successfully acquire the write lock
> */
> static struct rw_semaphore __sched *
> rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
> {
> + bool disable_rspin;
> struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
> DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
>
> /* do optimistic spinning and steal lock if possible */
> - if (rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem) && rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem)) {
> + if (rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(sem, RWSEM_WR_NONSPINNABLE) &&
> + rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem, true)) {
> /* rwsem_optimistic_spin() implies ACQUIRE on success */
> return sem;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Disable reader optimistic spinning for this rwsem after
> + * acquiring the write lock when the setting of the nonspinnable
> + * bits are observed.
> + */
> + disable_rspin = atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE;
> +
> /*
> * Optimistic spinning failed, proceed to the slowpath
> * and block until we can acquire the sem.
> @@ -1170,7 +1375,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
> if (waiter.handoff_set) {
> enum owner_state owner_state;
>
> - owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem);
> + owner_state = rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE);
> if (owner_state == OWNER_NULL)
> goto trylock_again;
> }
> @@ -1182,6 +1387,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> }
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> + rwsem_disable_reader_optspin(sem, disable_rspin);
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock);
> trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> @@ -1348,7 +1554,7 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(tmp < 0, sem);
> if (unlikely((tmp & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) ==
> RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> - clear_nonspinnable(sem);
> + clear_wr_nonspinnable(sem);
> rwsem_wake(sem);
> }
> preempt_enable();
I don't have a strong feeling pro or against it. It does provide a
modest improvement in some use cases, but it does make the code a bit
more complex and harder to understand.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists