lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 17:10:52 -0600
From:   Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To:     Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Fabiano Rosas <farosas@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@...wei.com>,
        Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Michael Larabel <michael@...haellarabel.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-mm@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2 04/10] kvm/arm64: make stage2 page tables
 RCU safe

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:28 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:06:55PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 1:37 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Yu,
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 02:13:07PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 12:08 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > > > > index 3d61bd3e591d..bfbebdcb4ef0 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > > > > @@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ static int stage2_unmap_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> > > > >                                                kvm_granule_size(ctx->level));
> > > > >
> > > > >         if (childp)
> > > > > -               mm_ops->put_page(childp);
> > > > > +               mm_ops->free_removed_table(childp, ctx->level);
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Oliver.
> > > >
> > > > A couple of things I haven't had the chance to verify -- I'm hoping
> > > > you could help clarify:
> > > > 1. For unmapping, with free_removed_table(), wouldn't we have to look
> > > > into the table we know it's empty unnecessarily?
> > >
> > > As it is currently implemented, yes. But, there's potential to fast-path
> > > the implementation by checking page_count() before starting the walk.
> >
> > Do you mind posting another patch? I'd be happy to ack it, as well as
> > the one you suggested above.
>
> I'd rather not take such a patch independent of the test_clear_young
> series if you're OK with that. Do you mind implementing something
> similar to the above patch w/ the proposed optimization if you need it?

No worries. I can take the above together with the following, which
would form a new series with its own merits, since apparently you
think the !AF case is important.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 26a8d955b49c..6ce73ce9f146 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1453,10 +1453,10 @@ static void handle_access_fault(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa)

        trace_kvm_access_fault(fault_ipa);

-       read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+       rcu_read_lock();
        mmu = vcpu->arch.hw_mmu;
        pte = kvm_pgtable_stage2_mkyoung(mmu->pgt, fault_ipa);
-       read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+       rcu_read_unlock();

        if (kvm_pte_valid(pte))
                kvm_set_pfn_accessed(kvm_pte_to_pfn(pte));

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ