[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230531231951.vg7x2w7gnnm77alq@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 23:20:02 +0000
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
To: Elson Roy Serrao <quic_eserrao@...cinc.com>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"quic_wcheng@...cinc.com" <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
"quic_jackp@...cinc.com" <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Skip TRBs while removing requests in
disconnect path
On Wed, May 31, 2023, Elson Roy Serrao wrote:
> Consider a scenario where cable disconnect happens when there is an active
> usb reqest queued to the UDC. As part of the disconnect we would issue an
> end transfer with no interrupt-on-completion before giving back this
> request. Since we are giving back the request without skipping TRBs the
> num_trbs field of dwc3_request still holds the stale value previously used.
> Function drivers re-use same request for a given bind-unbind session and
> hence their dwc3_request context gets preserved across cable
> disconnect/connect. When such a request gets re-queued after cable connect,
Why would we preserve the request after a disconnect? The request is
associated with an endpoint, and after disconnect, the endpoint is no
longer valid. Shouldn't the request be freed then?
BR,
Thinh
> we would increase the num_trbs field on top of the previous stale value
> thus incorrectly representing the number of TRBs used. Fix this by invoking
> skip_trbs() in the ep disable path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elson Roy Serrao <quic_eserrao@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index 578804d..b45e917 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -986,6 +986,8 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_enable(struct dwc3_ep *dep, unsigned int action)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void dwc3_gadget_ep_skip_trbs(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req);
> +
> void dwc3_remove_requests(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep, int status)
> {
> struct dwc3_request *req;
> @@ -1000,6 +1002,7 @@ void dwc3_remove_requests(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep, int status)
> while (!list_empty(&dep->started_list)) {
> req = next_request(&dep->started_list);
>
> + dwc3_gadget_ep_skip_trbs(dep, req);
> dwc3_gadget_giveback(dep, req, status);
> }
>
> @@ -1012,6 +1015,7 @@ void dwc3_remove_requests(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep, int status)
> while (!list_empty(&dep->cancelled_list)) {
> req = next_request(&dep->cancelled_list);
>
> + dwc3_gadget_ep_skip_trbs(dep, req);
> dwc3_gadget_giveback(dep, req, status);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists