[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHbisZ6eGOM0S0oj@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 23:01:21 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yhs@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
vincenzopalazzodev@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com,
brauner@...nel.org, michael.christie@...cle.com,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, glider@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
keescook@...omium.org, stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com,
alan.maguire@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Onkarnath <onkarnath.1@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kallsyms: add kallsyms_show_value defination in all
cases
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:56:00AM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote:
> so bpf_dump_raw_ok check is not changed.
Since you're adding a new file and making no changes to tons of code but
also making somew new changes I can't tell easily what is new or not.
Although I can see we're now adding a false case for bpf_dump_raw_ok()
it would be best if just split this int wo separate patches. One
non-functional, and a second wwone which extends the code.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists