[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN7PR12MB720180769155197B862CB1098B489@SN7PR12MB7201.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 06:59:47 +0000
From: "Havalige, Thippeswamy" <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: "krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Gogada, Bharat Kumar" <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>,
"Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@....com>,
"Yeleswarapu, Nagaradhesh" <nagaradhesh.yeleswarapu@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add YAML schemas
for Xilinx XDMA PCIe Root Port Bridge
Hi Conor Dooley,
Please find inline response.
Regards,
Thippeswamy H
>
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: xlnx,xdma-host-3.00
>
> Perhaps not a question for you Thippeswamy, but is there a reason for PCI
> root ports not having any soc-specific compatibles? Rob (if you see this when
> you're back)?
>
> > + interrupt-controller ;
>
> Looks like you didn't see Michal's comment about the extra space.
> If you resubmit for some other reason, you should fix that in the process :)
- Agreed, Will fix it in next patch.
> Cheers,
> Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists