[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHb7ubJYO2lyNkud@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:48:30 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] kexec: improve the readability of
crash_shrink_memory()
On 05/27/23 at 08:34pm, Zhen Lei wrote:
> The major adjustments are:
> 1. end = start + new_size.
> The 'end' here is not an accurate representation, because it is not the
> new end of crashk_res, but the start of ram_res, difference 1. So
> eliminate it and replace it with ram_res->start.
> 2. Use 'ram_res->start' and 'ram_res->end' as arguments to
> crash_free_reserved_phys_range() to indicate that the memory covered by
> 'ram_res' is released from the crashk. And keep it close to
> insert_resource().
> 3. Replace 'if (start == end)' with 'if (!new_size)', clear indication that
> all crashk memory will be shrunken.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
LGTM,
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/kexec_core.c | 15 +++++----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> index bcc86a250ab3bf9..69fe92141b0b62d 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> @@ -1108,7 +1108,6 @@ ssize_t crash_get_memory_size(void)
> int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> - unsigned long start, end;
> unsigned long old_size;
> struct resource *ram_res;
>
> @@ -1119,9 +1118,7 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size)
> ret = -ENOENT;
> goto unlock;
> }
> - start = crashk_res.start;
> - end = crashk_res.end;
> - old_size = (end == 0) ? 0 : end - start + 1;
> + old_size = !crashk_res.end ? 0 : resource_size(&crashk_res);
> new_size = roundup(new_size, KEXEC_CRASH_MEM_ALIGN);
> if (new_size >= old_size) {
> ret = (new_size == old_size) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> @@ -1134,22 +1131,20 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size)
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> - end = start + new_size;
> - crash_free_reserved_phys_range(end, crashk_res.end);
> -
> - ram_res->start = end;
> + ram_res->start = crashk_res.start + new_size;
> ram_res->end = crashk_res.end;
> ram_res->flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM;
> ram_res->name = "System RAM";
>
> - if (start == end) {
> + if (!new_size) {
> release_resource(&crashk_res);
> crashk_res.start = 0;
> crashk_res.end = 0;
> } else {
> - crashk_res.end = end - 1;
> + crashk_res.end = ram_res->start - 1;
> }
>
> + crash_free_reserved_phys_range(ram_res->start, ram_res->end);
> insert_resource(&iomem_resource, ram_res);
>
> unlock:
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists