[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <997002c8-2008-3209-3542-2ac0bbda99c3@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:31:45 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, xiang@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org, huyue2@...lpad.com, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] erofs: unify inline/share xattr iterators for
listxattr/getxattr
On 2023/5/31 16:16, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>
>
> On 5/31/23 2:57 PM, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/5/31 11:13, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>>> -static int inline_xattr_iter_begin(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
>>> - struct inode *inode)
>>> -{
>>> - struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
>>> - unsigned int xattr_header_sz, inline_xattr_ofs;
>>> -
>>> - xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
>>> - sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
>>> - if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
>>> - DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
>>> - return -ENOATTR;
>>> - }
>
> In the original implementation, here when xattr_header_sz >=
> vi->xattr_isize, inline_xattr_iter_begin() will return -ENOATTR rather
> than a negative integer (i.e. vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz).
Ah, sorry I misreaded that.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists