[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230531095742.2480623-2-qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 09:57:35 +0000
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tkhai@...ru, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
vbabka@...e.cz, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
djwong@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: move shrinker_debugfs_remove() before synchronize_srcu()
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
The debugfs_remove_recursive() will wait for debugfs_file_put()
to return, so there is no need to put it after synchronize_srcu()
to wait for the rcu read-side critical section to exit.
Just move it before synchronize_srcu(), which is also convenient
to put the heavy synchronize_srcu() in the delayed work later.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index eeca83e28c9b..a773e97e152e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -818,11 +818,11 @@ void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
debugfs_entry = shrinker_debugfs_detach(shrinker, &debugfs_id);
mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
+ shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
+
atomic_inc(&shrinker_srcu_generation);
synchronize_srcu(&shrinker_srcu);
- shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
-
kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists