[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01197bb8-da0d-f726-79bc-d8ab7d3ea992@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 14:35:06 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "amitk@...nel.org" <amitk@...nel.org>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: qoriq_thermal: only enable supported sensors
On 31/05/2023 14:05, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: qoriq_thermal: only enable supported
>> sensors
>>
>> On 16/05/2023 10:37, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>>
>>> There are MAX 16 sensors, but not all of them supported. Such as
>>> i.MX8MQ, there are only 3 sensors. Enabling all 16 sensors will touch
>>> reserved bits from i.MX8MQ reference mannual, and TMU will stuck,
>>> temperature will not update anymore.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 45038e03d633 ("thermal: qoriq: Enable all sensors before
>>> registering them")
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index b806a0929459..53748c4a5be1
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
>>> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
>>> #define TMR_DISABLE 0x0
>>> #define TMR_ME 0x80000000
>>> #define TMR_ALPF 0x0c000000
>>> -#define TMR_MSITE_ALL GENMASK(15, 0)
>>>
>>> #define REGS_TMTMIR 0x008 /* Temperature measurement
>> interval Register */
>>> #define TMTMIR_DEFAULT 0x0000000f
>>> @@ -105,6 +104,11 @@ static int tmu_get_temp(struct
>> thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>>> * within sensor range. TEMP is an 9 bit value representing
>>> * temperature in KelVin.
>>> */
>>> +
>>> + regmap_read(qdata->regmap, REGS_TMR, &val);
>>> + if (!(val & TMR_ME))
>>> + return -EAGAIN;
>>
>> How is this change related to what is described in the changelog?
>
> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register will invoke get temp,
> since we reverted the 45038e03d633 did, we need to check TMR_ME
> to avoid return invalid temperature.
From a higher perspective if the sensor won't be enabled, then the
thermal zone should not be registered, the get_temp won't happen on a
disabled sensor and this test won't be necessary, no ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists