[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHjAVnDAM/YzZSem@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:59:18 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:58:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 05:07:39PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 05:51:10PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:11:26AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > This is a sloppy logic analyzer using GPIOs. It comes with a script to
> > > > isolate a CPU for polling. While this is definitely not a production
> > > > level analyzer, it can be a helpful first view when remote debugging.
> > > > Read the documentation for details.
> > >
> > > Good enough I think,
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks, Andy!
> >
> > To GPIO maintainers: can we apply the "new-driver-rule" and still have
> > it in 5.19? There can't be any regression and it has all comments
> > addressed. Also, I am talking about this project at Kernel Recipes late
> > next week and it would be great to say that it is finally merged :)
>
> Year passed. Any news here?
Ah, GPIO maintainers probably missed this since no Cc.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists