[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHjIHZv4o8JaX7Dt@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 19:32:29 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] ieee802154: ca8210: Remove stray
gpiod_unexport() call
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:12:13AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com wrote on Sun, 28 May 2023 17:09:38
> +0300:
>
> > There is no gpiod_export() and gpiod_unexport() looks pretty much stray.
> > The gpiod_export() and gpiod_unexport() shouldn't be used in the code,
> > GPIO sysfs is deprecated. That said, simply drop the stray call.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Any reason not to consider a backport into stable kernels?
> Cc: stable + Fixes would certainly be welcome in this case?
I don't think it's justified for stable. It doesn't fix any existing regression
as far as I understand.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists