linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 04/13] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: remove q6 clocks macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d64b9718-0c85-6e5d-7c5b-6ea617e36a32@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 20:55:52 +0200
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
        mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, quic_eberman@...cinc.com, quic_mojha@...cinc.com,
        kvalo@...nel.org, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com,
        quic_kathirav@...cinc.com, quic_anusha@...cinc.com,
        quic_poovendh@...cinc.com, quic_varada@...cinc.com,
        quic_devipriy@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/13] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: remove q6
 clocks macros

On 30. 05. 2023. 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 22/05/2023 00:28, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>> Since Q6 firmware takes care of bring up clocks in multipd
>> model, remove bring up clock macros.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5018.h | 21 --------------------
>>   1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
>>
> I am fine with this if it still compiles... I have doubts about it,
> unless of some depedencies (you mentioned three !)... but then it gets
> complicated.
>
> Keep patches doing same logical change in same patchset. This dependency
> dance in recent submissions is making things tricky and prolonging your
> upstreaming process significantly.

Considering that the basic IPQ5018 patchset that this series depends on
has not yet been merged, why not just drop these there instead?

Regards,
Robert

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
>