linux-kernel - Re: CXL memory device not created correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ns63paacatejvt5udpj7ssnyzp75aphbenw7ac5o2xcjiln6l4@lisofmey2kca>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 20:46:59 -0700
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, LiuLele <liu.lele@...com>,
        dave.jiang@...el.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        alison.schofield@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        bwidawsk@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, helgaas@...nel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com
Subject: Re: CXL memory device not created correctly

On Wed, 31 May 2023, Ira Weiny wrote:

>I don't think the kernel should be changed for following the spec.

Agreed. If events are mandatory we just have to bite the bullet.

Thanks,
Davidlohr