linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] ufs: core: Combine ufshcd_mq_poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230601225048.12228-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Jun 2023 06:50:48 +0800
From:   Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To:     <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <bvanassche@....org>
CC:     <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ufs: core: Combine ufshcd_mq_poll_cqe functions

Currently, ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock() is only called by
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with the addition of a spinlock wrapper
for ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock(). Combining these two functions
into one would result in cleaner code.

Reviewed-by: Bao D. Nguyen <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c | 17 ++++-------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
index 920eb954f594..785fc9762cad 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
@@ -307,11 +307,13 @@ void ufshcd_mcq_compl_all_cqes_lock(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwq->cq_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static unsigned long ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock(struct ufs_hba *hba,
-						struct ufs_hw_queue *hwq)
+unsigned long ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+				       struct ufs_hw_queue *hwq)
 {
 	unsigned long completed_reqs = 0;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&hwq->cq_lock, flags);
 	ufshcd_mcq_update_cq_tail_slot(hwq);
 	while (!ufshcd_mcq_is_cq_empty(hwq)) {
 		ufshcd_mcq_process_cqe(hba, hwq);
@@ -321,17 +323,6 @@ static unsigned long ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 
 	if (completed_reqs)
 		ufshcd_mcq_update_cq_head(hwq);
-
-	return completed_reqs;
-}
-
-unsigned long ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock(struct ufs_hba *hba,
-				       struct ufs_hw_queue *hwq)
-{
-	unsigned long completed_reqs, flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&hwq->cq_lock, flags);
-	completed_reqs = ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock(hba, hwq);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwq->cq_lock, flags);
 
 	return completed_reqs;
-- 
2.18.0