linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Fix sc8180x clocks and interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:25:51 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Fix sc8180x clocks and
 interrupts

On 01/06/2023 09:21, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 31-05-23, 10:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/05/2023 18:24, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> Commit 45a3ec891370 ("PCI: qcom: Add sc8180x compatible") added sc8180x
>>> compatible and commit 075a9d55932e ("dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Convert to
>>> YAML") converted the description to yaml
>>>
>>> But there are still some errors specific to sc8180x which this change
>>> attempts to fix. The clocks and resets for sc8180 pcie controller are
>>> different so need to be documented separately
>>
>> I don't get what's the error here to fix. The clocks you list are
>> already there as part of oneOf.
> 
> It was listed with sm8150 block which has different set of clocks than
> used in sc81880x, so this needs to have its own block of clocks and
> resets


Ah, after careful check I see indeed difference in one clock.

Best regards,
Krzysztof