[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dfd0f47-e1f7-1e9f-65e0-ee4881495be3@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:52:01 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] selftests/mm: factor out detection of hugetlb page
sizes into vm_util
On 28.05.23 16:49, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:27:21PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's factor detection out into vm_util, to be reused by a new test.
>>
>
> Bit of a nit as it's hardly vitally important, but perhaps worth mentioning
> that you also refactor the function to accept any array (this is a
> requirement rather than simply refactoring a thing but still :)
Well, the function used to, and still does accept an array. It's just a
more human-friendly way of expressing that.
If I have to resend the whole patchset, I can add a note "While at it,
make the function accept an array instead of a raw pointer.".
[...]
>
> Looks good to me,
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
>
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists