linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] sock: Remove redundant cond of memcg pressure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1fb805bc-baef-ee09-fa3a-d464af94751f@bytedance.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:21:29 +0800
From:   Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Cc:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] sock: Remove redundant cond of memcg pressure

On 6/1/23 5:10 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 19:40 +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
>> Now with the previous patch, __sk_mem_raise_allocated() considers
>> the memory pressure of both global and the socket's memcg on a func-
>> wide level,
> 
> Since the "previous patch" (aka "sock: Consider memcg pressure when
> raising sockmem") has been dropped in this series revision, I guess
> this patch should be dropped, too?

Yes indeed, these two patches should go together. Sorry for my
carelessness.

> 
> Is this targeting the 'net-next' tree or the 'net' one? please specify
> the target tree into the subj line. I think we could consider net-next
> for this series, given the IMHO not trivial implications.

Got it, I will resend this series based on net-next.

Thanks!
	Abel