lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 05:52:24 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Andrey God <andreygod83@...tonmail.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, kbusch@...nel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.3 01/67] nvme-pci: add NVME_QUIRK_BOGUS_NID for
 HS-SSD-FUTURE 2048G

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 07:02:01PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote:
>Hi Sasha,
>
>This feedback is on the whole 67-patch series.  I'm replying to patch 1 because
>this series lacks a cover letter.  Please include a cover letter next time.
>
>This series doesn't apply because the following error happens on patch 35:
>
>    Applying: tipc: add tipc_bearer_min_mtu to calculate min mtu
>    error: patch failed: net/tipc/bearer.h:146
>    error: net/tipc/bearer.h: patch does not apply
>    error: patch failed: net/tipc/udp_media.c:738
>    error: net/tipc/udp_media.c: patch does not apply
>    Patch failed at 0035 tipc: add tipc_bearer_min_mtu to calculate min mtu
>
>For the base commit I tried the latest linux-6.3.y, both with and without the
>latest queue-6.3 applied.

Yup, it was based on the prior release, and the conflict you see here is
because the patch in question was brought in to the stable tree via a
different route.

>As with any kernel patch series, please make it clear what the base commit is.
>Otherwise the series is unreviewable and untestable.

Ack, I can add annotation of the base. In general - if an AUTOSEL patch
fails to apply/build when brought to a newer release, it'll simply get
dropped.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ