[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87jzwneao5.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 12:31:22 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: Direct rdtsc call side-effect
On Thu, Jun 01 2023 at 10:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:45:35PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> We are thinking of saving and restoring the timestamp counter at suspend
>> and resume time respectively. In theory it can work on Intel because of
>> TSC_ADJUST register. But it'll never work on AMD until:
>> * AMD supports the same kind of adjust register. (AMD has said that the
>> adjust register cannot be implemented in their firmware. They'll have to
>> add it to their hardware.)
>> * by manual synchronization in kernel (I know you don't like this idea. But
>> there is something Windows is doing to save/restore and sync the TSC)
>
> Wine could set TIF_NOTSC, which will cause it to run with CR4.TSD
> cleared and cause RDTSC to #GP, at which point you can emulate it.
We should ask Microsoft to do the same. That'll fix the direct RDTSC
usage quickly. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists