lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:23:58 +0100
From:   Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        "meenakshi.aggarwal@....com" <meenakshi.aggarwal@....com>,
        "horia.geanta@....com" <horia.geanta@....com>,
        "V.sethi@....com" <V.sethi@....com>,
        "pankaj.gupta@....com" <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
        "gaurav.jain@....com" <gaurav.jain@....com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "iuliana.prodan@....com" <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
        <lucas.segarra.fernandez@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY flag

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 04:55:03PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > This isn't mentioned in the documentation for CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY.  So
> > it's not part of the contract of CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY currently.
> >
> > Please don't make this change without updating the documentation.
> >
> > If you'd like to make this change, please update the documentation for
> > CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY to mention this additional exception.
> 
> Agreed.  We talked about this at the time of the original patch-set,
> but never made any changes in this direction.
> 
> Apparently the users are still the same so it should be possible
> but it has to be done in the right order as Eric suggested.
BTW, some time ago we did an assessment of the users of
!CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY and we came to the conclusion that we
cannot just update the documentation.
dm-crypt uses scatterlists with at most 4 entries. dm-integrity,
instead, might allocate memory for scatterlists with an arbitrary number
of entries.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/msg65282.html

Any suggestion on how to move forward for drivers that allocate memory?

Regards,

-- 
Giovanni

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ