[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHiQ44gAL3YEZPUh@orome>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:36:51 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>,
"jsnitsel@...hat.com" <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>,
"jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:04:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > any ideas on how we can best get this merged? I guess at this point it
> > could go through either tree since the SPI dependency has been in Linus'
> > tree since v6.4-rc1.
>
> I would expect it to go via whatever path TPM patches usually take given
> that it's a TPM patch.
There might have been a misunderstanding. My recollection was that you
had said a few weeks ago that you would pick this up. Going through the
thread again I realize that may not have been what you meant. Perhaps
Jarkko misinterpreted this in the same way.
Jarkko, can you pick this up for v6.5?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists