linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/42] 6.1.32-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:39:54 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/42] 6.1.32-rc1 review

On 6/1/23 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 07:41:08PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 18:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.32 release.
>>> There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 03 Jun 2023 13:19:19 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>          https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.32-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>>
>> Following build errors noticed on 6.1 and 5.15.
>>
>> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c: In function 'atmel_xdmac_resume':
>> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c:2049:9: error: implicit declaration of function
>> 'pm_runtime_get_noresume' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>   2049 |         pm_runtime_get_noresume(atxdmac->dev);
>>        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c:2049:40: error: 'struct at_xdmac' has no member
>> named 'dev'
>>   2049 |         pm_runtime_get_noresume(atxdmac->dev);
>>        |                                        ^~
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> reported link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYswtPyrYJbwcGFhc5o7mkRmWZEWCCeSjmR64M+N-odQhQ@mail.gmail.com/
>>
>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> Ah, the .h file was added by 650b0e990cbd ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: add
> runtime pm support"), which isn't needed here.  I'll go add it by hand

Really ? Some of the dma patches seem to fix runtime pm support, and
"dmaengine: at_xdmac: disable/enable clock directly on suspend/resume"
is even tagged with

Fixes: 650b0e990cbd ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: add runtime pm support")

Why do we need to fix code which isn't present in 6.1.y ?

Guenter

> and push out some -rc2 releases for this and 5.15.y, thanks!
> 
> greg k-h