[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90979d06-1f6b-90ee-4a68-0f5cc013c82a@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 17:02:36 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, will@...nel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, bwicaksono@...dia.com,
ilkka@...amperecomputing.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf/arm_cspmu: Clean up ACPI dependency
On 01/06/2023 12:59, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Build-wise, the ACPI dependency consists of only a couple of things
> which could probably stand being factored out into ACPI helpers anyway.
> However for the immediate concern of working towards Devicetree support
> here, it's easy enough to make a few tweaks to contain the affected code
> locally, such that we can relax the Kconfig dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig | 3 +--
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> index 0b316fe69a45..25d25ded0983 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> @@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
>
> config ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
> tristate "ARM Coresight Architecture PMU"
> - depends on ARM64 && ACPI
> - depends on ACPI_APMT || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> help
> Provides support for performance monitoring unit (PMU) devices
> based on ARM CoreSight PMU architecture. Note that this PMU
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index 72dc7a9e1ca8..3b91115c376d 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <acpi/processor.h>
>
> #include "arm_cspmu.h"
> #include "nvidia_cspmu.h"
> @@ -1075,6 +1074,9 @@ static int arm_cspmu_request_irq(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +
> static inline int arm_cspmu_find_cpu_container(int cpu, u32 container_uid)
> {
> u32 acpi_uid;
> @@ -1099,7 +1101,7 @@ static inline int arm_cspmu_find_cpu_container(int cpu, u32 container_uid)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> -static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +static int arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> {
> struct device *dev;
> struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
> @@ -1135,6 +1137,17 @@ static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#else
> +static int arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +{
> + return arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(cspmu);
> +}
>
> static int arm_cspmu_register_pmu(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> {
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists