[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ad62f37-8cf7-6bd0-3d4d-d04d5def893c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:01:20 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] soundwire: stream: Invert logic on runtime alloc
flags
On 6/2/23 05:11, Charles Keepax wrote:
> sdw_stream_add_slave/master have flags to indicate if the master or
> slave runtime where allocated in that call to the function. Currently
> these flags are cleared on all the paths where the runtime is not
> allocated, it is more logic and simpler to set the flag on the one path
> where the runtime is allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Much easier to review indeed, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Split out of the goto patch to ease review
>
> Also worth noting I guess this patch could be squashed with patch 1 in
> the series really, but I opted to leave them separate as patch 1 is a
> much simpler fix to be cherry-picked back to older kernels if someone
> needs the fixup, rather than mixing the fixup and tidy up.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> index 6595f47b403b5..df5600a80c174 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> @@ -1854,7 +1854,7 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
> {
> struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> - bool alloc_master_rt = true;
> + bool alloc_master_rt = false;
> int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
> @@ -1876,10 +1876,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> * it first), if so skip allocation and go to configuration
> */
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(bus, stream);
> - if (m_rt) {
> - alloc_master_rt = false;
> + if (m_rt)
> goto skip_alloc_master_rt;
> - }
>
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream);
> if (!m_rt) {
> @@ -1888,6 +1886,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto unlock;
> }
> +
> + alloc_master_rt = true;
> skip_alloc_master_rt:
>
> if (sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt))
> @@ -1980,8 +1980,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> {
> struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
> struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> - bool alloc_master_rt = true;
> - bool alloc_slave_rt = true;
> + bool alloc_master_rt = false;
> + bool alloc_slave_rt = false;
>
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1992,10 +1992,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> * and go to configuration
> */
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(slave->bus, stream);
> - if (m_rt) {
> - alloc_master_rt = false;
> + if (m_rt)
> goto skip_alloc_master_rt;
> - }
>
> /*
> * If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid.
> @@ -2009,21 +2007,22 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> + alloc_master_rt = true;
> +
> skip_alloc_master_rt:
> s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream);
> - if (s_rt) {
> - alloc_slave_rt = false;
> + if (s_rt)
> goto skip_alloc_slave_rt;
> - }
>
> s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt);
> if (!s_rt) {
> dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", stream->name);
> - alloc_slave_rt = false;
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto alloc_error;
> }
>
> + alloc_slave_rt = true;
> +
> skip_alloc_slave_rt:
> if (sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt))
> goto skip_port_alloc;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists