[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230602100500.2416fabea876b03b129bbf23@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:05:00 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the tip tree
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:04:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the mm tree as a different commit (but
> the same patch):
> 
>   b7a7ce1bb77b ("vdso/timens: Always provide arch_get_vdso_data() prototype for vdso")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   0361c2513d36 ("time_namespace: always provide arch_get_vdso_data() prototype for vdso")
> 
> in the mm tree.
Thanks.  I think I'll leave things as-is - both trees want the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists