[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230602023456.47362-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:34:56 +0800
From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To: simon.horman@...igine.com
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, davthompson@...dia.com, asmaa@...dia.com,
mkl@...gutronix.de, limings@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlxbf_gige: Add missing check for platform_get_irq
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 23:08:54 +0800, Simon Horman wrote:
> Let's take a step back.
>
> The script is here, so you can take a look at what it does.
> And I dare say that changes can be proposed.
>
> https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/blob/master/tests/patch/cc_maintainers/test.py
>
> I'd also say that the problem here is that Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com>
> appears in the above mentioned commit that is being fixed.
>
> I think that get_maintainer will dell you this if you run it
> on your patch. Which is what the script appears to do.
>
> Locally, I see:
>
> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git-min-percent 25 this.patch
> "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS,blamed_fixes:1/1=100%)
> Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS,commit_signer:5/5=100%)
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com> (commit_signer:4/5=80%,blamed_fixes:1/1=100%)
> David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com> (commit_signer:4/5=80%,authored:4/5=80%,added_lines:94/95=99%,removed_lines:19/20=95%,blamed_fixes:1/1=100%)
> Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com> (blamed_fixes:1/1=100%)
> netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
>
> N.B.: The script excludes linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
I have got it. I will run the script on the patch.
>
>
> As an aside. This patch is missing v2.
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] ...
The patch is not changed. I only add a recipient.
Therefore, I think it is not a v2.
Thanks,
Jiasheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists