[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d233f87d-fb86-4c84-298d-0ca573abba01@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:22:04 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] selftests/mm: set -Wno-format-security to avoid
uffd build warnings
On 6/2/23 03:15, David Hildenbrand wrote:
...
> Maybe the following will silence the warning by removing test_name
> completely:
>
>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> index 269c86768a02..15c76ce972be 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> @@ -1149,7 +1149,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> uffd_test_case_t *test;
> mem_type_t *mem_type;
> uffd_test_args_t args;
> - char test_name[128];
> const char *errmsg;
> int has_uffd, opt;
> int i, j;
> @@ -1192,10 +1191,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> mem_type = &mem_types[j];
> if (!(test->mem_targets & mem_type->mem_flag))
> continue;
> - snprintf(test_name, sizeof(test_name),
> - "%s on %s", test->name, mem_type->name);
>
> - uffd_test_start(test_name);
> + uffd_test_start("%s on %s", test->name, mem_type->name);
> if (!uffd_feature_supported(test)) {
> uffd_test_skip("feature missing");
> continue;
>
Yes, that does clean up one of the two warnings nicely. I'll do that
instead -Wno-format-security, thanks.
That still leaves another similar warning that fires for "errmsg".
However, that one is easily fixed because the associated macro turns out
to be unnecessary, because all callers pass a simple char* string,
without any format specifiers.
So just turning one macro into a C function fixes that, leaving us with
this (plus your fix from above):
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
index 269c86768a02..04d91f144d1c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
@@ -109,12 +109,11 @@ static void uffd_test_pass(void)
ksft_inc_fail_cnt(); \
} while (0)
-#define uffd_test_skip(...) do { \
- printf("skipped [reason: "); \
- printf(__VA_ARGS__); \
- printf("]\n"); \
- ksft_inc_xskip_cnt(); \
- } while (0)
+static void uffd_test_skip(const char *message)
+{
+ printf("skipped [reason: %s]\n", message);
+ ksft_inc_xskip_cnt();
+}
I'll send that in a v2.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists