[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <393545F8-AB12-47F6-9293-75B2274CF7B2@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 22:11:51 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>
CC: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...a.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] watchdog: Allow nmi watchdog to use "ref-cycles" event
Hi Andrew and Peter,
Friendly ping... Any comment on this one?
Thanks,
Song
> On May 25, 2023, at 3:20 PM, Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew and Peter,
>
>
>> On May 19, 2023, at 9:59 AM, Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew and Peter,
>>
>> Does this version look good do you?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Song
>>
>>> On May 17, 2023, at 5:25 PM, Song Liu <song@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> NMI watchdog permanently consumes one hardware counters per CPU on the
>>> system. For systems that use many hardware counters, this causes more
>>> aggressive time multiplexing of perf events.
>>>
>>> OTOH, some CPUs (mostly Intel) support "ref-cycles" event, which is rarely
>>> used. Add kernel cmdline arg nmi_watchdog=ref-cycles to configure the
>>> watchdog to use "ref-cycles" event instead of "cycles".
>>>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
>
> Could you please share your comments on this patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists