[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7J=4iMPQQw=V1C4MLFf=cP94gSwVx1g7M4YL0W6OLHRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:02:16 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble
memory as ROX
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 4:07 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > > +static void __init_or_module do_text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> > > +{
> > > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > > + text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len);
> > > + } else {
> > > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > > + text_poke(addr, opcode, len);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> >
> > So I don't much like do_text_poke(); why?
>
> I believe the idea was to keep memcpy for early boot before the kernel
> image is protected without going and adding if (is_module_text_address())
> all over the place.
>
> I think this can be used instead without updating all the call sites of
> text_poke_early():
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> index 91057de8e6bc..f994e63e9903 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ void __init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode,
> * code cannot be running and speculative code-fetches are
> * prevented. Just change the code.
> */
> - memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
> + text_poke_copy(addr, opcode, len);
> } else {
> local_irq_save(flags);
> memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
>
This alone doesn't work, as text_poke_early() is called
before addr is added to the list of module texts. So we
still use memcpy() here.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists