[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cf3f726120846fabfcca269155d948c@realtek.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:33:55 +0000
From: Stanley Chang[昌育德]
<stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Ray Chi <raychi@...gle.com>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: phy: realtek: Add the doc about the Realtek SoC USB 2.0/3.0 PHY
Hi Krzysztof,
> >> If these can be in the driver, why would ever they be in DTS in the first
> place?
> >>
> > Our platforms have 3 xhci controllers which map to 3 different phy ports.
>
> You mean on the same SoC?
Yes, one SoC has three xhci controllers.
> > And the three phy ports use the same driver, but the parameters are
> different.
> > So I put the parameter settings in DTS, we have 3 usb-phy nodes representing
> 3 phy ports.
> > Also, some parameters have to be adjusted for different boards.
> > Therefore, it is more applicable in DTS than in driver.
>
> Then it looks justified in DT, so please write proper descriptions for proper
> properties. Underscores are not allowed in node names. No fake nodes.
> Properties should usually describe physical/hardware effect not the register
> value.
I will write more detail for properties.
> qcom,usb-snps-femto-v2.yaml is nice example. Few Mediatek bindings also
> would work.
> '
Thanks,
Stanley
Powered by blists - more mailing lists