[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230602083226.1034597-1-aliceryhl@google.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 08:32:25 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: gary@...yguo.net
Cc: alex.gaynor@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojeda@...nel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org, walmeida@...rosoft.com, wedsonaf@...il.com,
yakoyoku@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] rust: workqueue: define built-in queues
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net> writes:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:49:42 +0000
> Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>> From: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>
>>
>> We provide these methods because it lets us access these queues from
>> Rust without using unsafe code.
>>
>> These methods return `&'static Queue`. References annotated with the
>> 'static lifetime are used when the referent will stay alive forever.
>> That is ok for these queues because they are global variables and cannot
>> be destroyed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
>
> This looks fine to me, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
>
> Just one question about style: would people prefer:
>
> kernel::workqueue::system().enqueue(...)
>
> or
>
> use kernel::workqueue::Queue;
> Queue::system().enqueue(...)
>
> ?
I prefer the first version.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists