linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] memory: atmel-sdramc: remove the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168569528350.11883.3990598454561917436.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri,  2 Jun 2023 10:41:26 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memory: atmel-sdramc: remove the driver


On Tue, 16 May 2023 10:24:05 +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Driver does only clock request + enable for DDR clocks. DDR clocks are
> enabled by bootloader and need to stay that way in Linux. To avoid having
> these clocks disabled by clock subsystem in case there are no Linux
> consumers for them the clocks were marked as critical in clock drivers
> (in commit 68b3b6f1773d ("clk: at91: mark ddr clocks as critical")).
> With this, there is no need to have a separate driver that only does
> clock request + enable.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] memory: atmel-sdramc: remove the driver
      https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl/c/d3369a4b6f0164b8869a097547846ed4e5c9c47f

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>