[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88a9afd9-eb2d-55b0-e65e-dec209a5bba3@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:27:39 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...el.com>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Handle the failure case of
dmar_reenable_qi()
On 2023-06-02 03:05, Yanfei Xu wrote:
> dmar_reenable_qi() may not succeed. Check and return when it fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 8096273b034c..e9188d045609 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2967,10 +2967,14 @@ static int init_iommu_hw(void)
> {
> struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> struct intel_iommu *iommu = NULL;
> + int ret;
>
> - for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd)
> + for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> if (iommu->qi)
> - dmar_reenable_qi(iommu);
> + ret = dmar_reenable_qi(iommu);
> + if (ret)
Nit: either this should be inside the previous condition, or you need to
initialise ret to 0.
Thanks,
Robin.
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> for_each_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> if (drhd->ignored) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists