linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/37] 5.15.115-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Jun 2023 05:33:12 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/37] 5.15.115-rc2 review

On 6/2/23 05:07, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 15:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.115 release.
>> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
> 
> s390 allmodconfig build fails with the error:
> 
> arch/s390/kernel/uv.c: In function 'should_export_before_import':
> arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:204:40: error: 'mm_context_t' has no member
> named 'protected_count'
>    204 |         return atomic_read(&mm->context.protected_count) > 1;
>        |                                        ^
> arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:205:1: error: control reaches end of non-void
> function [-Werror=return-type]
>    205 | }
>        | ^
> 

Missing commit 07fbdf7f93479 ("KVM: s390: pv: usage counter
instead of flag"), but I don't know if that alone is sufficient
(there have been other commits adding to its use).

Guenter