lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19bd262c-9063-5c7c-02b2-aa507c8c2a31@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Jun 2023 22:38:33 +0800
From:   Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC:     Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
        Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
        Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
        Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] coresight-tpdm: Add nodes for dsb edge control


On 6/2/2023 4:45 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 02/06/2023 09:21, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>
>> On 6/1/2023 8:14 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> On 27/04/2023 10:00, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>> Add the nodes to set value for DSB edge control and DSB edge
>>>> control mask. Each DSB subunit TPDM has maximum of n(n<16) EDCR
>>>> resgisters to configure edge control. DSB edge detection control
>>>> 00: Rising edge detection
>>>> 01: Falling edge detection
>>>> 10: Rising and falling edge detection (toggle detection)
>>>> And each DSB subunit TPDM has maximum of m(m<8) ECDMR registers to
>>>> configure mask. Eight 32 bit registers providing DSB interface
>>>> edge detection mask control.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm   |  32 +++++
>>>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c       | 135 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h       |  21 ++++
>>>>   3 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git 
>>>> a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm 
>>>> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>>> index 348e167..a57f000 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>>> @@ -60,3 +60,35 @@ Description:
>>>>           Bit[3] : Set to 0 for low performance mode.
>>>>                    Set to 1 for high performance mode.
>>>>           Bit[4:8] : Select byte lane for high performance mode.
>>>> +
>>>> +What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<tpdm-name>/dsb_edge_ctrl
>>>> +Date:        March 2023
>>>> +KernelVersion    6.3
>>>> +Contact:    Jinlong Mao (QUIC) <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>, Tao 
>>>> Zhang (QUIC) <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>>>> +Description:
>>>> +        Read/Write a set of the edge control registers of the DSB
>>>> +        in TPDM.
>>>> +
>>>> +        Expected format is the following:
>>>> +        <integer1> <integer2> <integer3>
>>>> +
>>>> +        Where:
>>>> +        <integer1> : Start EDCR register number
>>>> +        <integer2> : End EDCR register number
>>>> +        <integer3> : The value need to be written
>>>> +
>>>> +What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<tpdm-name>/dsb_edge_ctrl_mask
>>>> +Date:        March 2023
>>>> +KernelVersion    6.3
>>>> +Contact:    Jinlong Mao (QUIC) <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>, Tao 
>>>> Zhang (QUIC) <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>>>> +Description:
>>>> +        Read/Write a set of the edge control mask registers of the
>>>> +        DSB in TPDM.
>>>> +
>>>> +        Expected format is the following:
>>>> +        <integer1> <integer2> <integer3>
>>>> +
>>>> +        Where:
>>>> +        <integer1> : Start EDCMR register number
>>>> +        <integer2> : End EDCMR register number
>>>> +        <integer3> : The value need to be written
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c 
>>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> index 1bacaa5..a40e458 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> @@ -80,7 +80,14 @@ static void set_trigger_type(struct tpdm_drvdata 
>>>> *drvdata, u32 *val)
>>>>     static void tpdm_enable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>>>   {
>>>> -    u32 val;
>>>> +    u32 val, i;
>>>> +
>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCR; i++)
>>>> +        writel_relaxed(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl[i],
>>>> +               drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_EDCR(i));
>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCMR; i++)
>>>> + writel_relaxed(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[i],
>>>> +               drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_EDCMR(i));
>>>
>>> Do all TPDM DSBs have MAX_EDCR registers ? Or some have less than 
>>> that ?
>>> If it is latter, do we need special care to avoid writing to inexistent
>>> registers ?
>>>
>> You are right, not all DSB TPDMs have MAX_EDCR registers. In our 
>> design, the inexistent register addresses
>>
>> are not occupied and safe for accessing.
>>
>> Currently we don't have a good way to know the quantity of EDCR/EDCMR 
>> registers for DSB TPDMs.
>>
>> The only way we can think of is to set it in device tree manually.
>>
>> Do you have other suggestion for this?
>>
>>>>         val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_TIER);
>>>>       /* Set trigger timestamp */
>>>> @@ -313,6 +320,130 @@ static ssize_t dsb_mode_store(struct device 
>>>> *dev,
>>>>   }
>>>>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_mode);
>>>>   +static ssize_t dsb_edge_ctrl_show(struct device *dev,
>>>> +                       struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> +                       char *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>>> +    ssize_t size = 0;
>>>> +    int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +    spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCR; i++) {
>>>> +        size += sysfs_emit_at(buf, size,
>>>> +                  "Index:0x%x Val:0x%x\n", i,
>>>> +                  drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl[i]);
>>>
>>> It may be safe, but please add a check to make sure that we don't
>>> overflow. At least bail out when we hit a return of 0, indicating
>>> reached the end of buffer.
>>>
>> Can I add the following check to replace the current code??
>>
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCR; i++) {
>>
>>      ret = sysfs_emit_at(buf, size, "Index:0x%x Val:0x%x\n", i, 
>> drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl[i]);
>>
>>      if (!ret) {
>>
>>          dev_warn(drvdata->dev, "The buffer has been overflowed\n");
>
> You don't need this, it already triggers a WARN() in sysfs_emit_at().
> So you could do:
>
>     for (....) {
>         unsigned long bytes = sysfs_emit_at(buf, size, ....);
>
>         if (bytes <= 0)
>             break;
>         size += bytes;
>     }
>
Sure, I will update in the next patch series.
>
>>
>>          spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>
>>          return size;
>>
>>      } else
>>
>>          size += ret;
>>
>> }
>>
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +    return size;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * value 1: Start EDCR register number
>>>> + * value 2: End EDCR register number
>>>> + * value 3: The value need to be written
>>>> + * The EDCR registers can include up to 16 32-bit registers, and each
>>>> + * one can be configured to control up to 16 edge detections(2 bits
>>>> + * control one edge detection). So a total 256 edge detections can be
>>>> + * configured. So the starting number(value 1) and ending 
>>>> number(value 2)
>>>> + * cannot be greater than 256, and value 1 should be less than 
>>>> value 2.
>>>> + * The following values are the rage of value 3.
>>>> + * 0 - Rising edge detection
>>>> + * 1 - Falling edge detection
>>>> + * 2 - Rising and falling edge detection (toggle detection)
>>>> + */
>>>> +static ssize_t dsb_edge_ctrl_store(struct device *dev,
>>>> +                    struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> +                    const char *buf,
>>>> +                    size_t size)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>>> +    unsigned long val, mask, start, end, edge_ctrl, edge_ctrl_shift;
>>>> +    int i, reg;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (sscanf(buf, "%lx %lx %lx", &start, &end, &edge_ctrl) != 3)
>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>>> +    if ((start >= TPDM_DSB_MAX_LINES) || (end >= 
>>>> TPDM_DSB_MAX_LINES) ||
>>>> +        (start > end) || (edge_ctrl > 0x2))
>>>> +        return -EPERM;
>>>> +
>>>> +    spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +    for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * There are 2 bit per DSB Edge Control line.
>>>> +         * Thus we have 16 lines in a 32bit word.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +        reg = EDCR_TO_WORD_IDX(i);
>>>> +        mask = EDCR_TO_WORD_MASK(i);
>>>> +        val = drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl[reg];
>>>
>>>> +        edge_ctrl_shift = EDCR_TO_WORD_VAL(edge_ctrl, i);
>>>> +        bitmap_replace(&val, &val, &edge_ctrl_shift, &mask, 32);
>>>
>>> Could we simply do :
>>>
>>>         reg &= ~mask;
>>>         reg |= FIELD_PREP(mask, edge_ctrl);
>>>
>> Perhaps "FIELD_PREP" cannot be used here since "mask" must be 
>> constant in this macro.
>
> Ah, you are right. Sorry about that.
>
>>
>> But in our code, the variable "mask" is not constant.
>
> Still I think using the bitmap_replace is an overkill. We could simply
> do:
>         val &= ~mask;
>         val |= EDCR_TO_WORD_VAL(edge_ctrl, i);

Sure, I will update in the next patch series.


Best,

Tao

>
> Suzuki
>
>>>
>>>> + drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl[reg] = val;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +
>>>> +    return size;
>>>> +}
>>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_edge_ctrl);
>>>> +
>>>> +static ssize_t dsb_edge_ctrl_mask_show(struct device *dev,
>>>> +                        struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> +                        char *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>>> +    ssize_t size = 0;
>>>> +    int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +    spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCMR; i++) {
>>>> +        size += sysfs_emit_at(buf, size,
>>>> +                  "Index:0x%x Val:0x%x\n", i,
>>>> +                  drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[i]);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +    return size;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * value 1: Start EDCMR register number
>>>> + * value 2: End EDCMR register number
>>>> + * value 3: The value need to be written
>>>> + */
>>>> +static ssize_t dsb_edge_ctrl_mask_store(struct device *dev,
>>>> +                         struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> +                         const char *buf,
>>>> +                         size_t size)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>>> +    unsigned long start, end, val;
>>>> +    u32 set;
>>>> +    int i, reg;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (sscanf(buf, "%lx %lx %lx", &start, &end, &val) != 3)
>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>>> +    if ((start >= TPDM_DSB_MAX_LINES) || (end >= TPDM_DSB_MAX_LINES)
>>>> +        || (start > end) || (val & ~1UL))
>>>> +        return -EPERM;
>>>> +
>>>> +    spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +    for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * There is 1 bit per DSB Edge Control Mark line.
>>>> +         * Thus we have 32 lines in a 32bit word.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +        reg = EDCMR_TO_WORD_IDX(i);
>>>> +        set = drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[reg];
>>>> +        if (val)
>>>> +            set |= BIT(EDCR_TO_WORD_SHIFT(i));
>>>> +        else
>>>> +            set &= ~BIT(EDCR_TO_WORD_SHIFT(i));
>>>> +        drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[reg] = set;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>> +    return size;
>>>> +}
>>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_edge_ctrl_mask);
>>>> +
>>>>   static ssize_t dsb_trig_type_show(struct device *dev,
>>>>                        struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>>>>   {
>>>> @@ -385,6 +516,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_trig_ts);
>>>>     static struct attribute *tpdm_dsb_attrs[] = {
>>>>       &dev_attr_dsb_mode.attr,
>>>> +    &dev_attr_dsb_edge_ctrl.attr,
>>>> +    &dev_attr_dsb_edge_ctrl_mask.attr,
>>>>       &dev_attr_dsb_trig_ts.attr,
>>>>       &dev_attr_dsb_trig_type.attr,
>>>>       NULL,
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h 
>>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>>>> index 79df07e..f25dcdec 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>>>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>>>>   /* DSB Subunit Registers */
>>>>   #define TPDM_DSB_CR        (0x780)
>>>>   #define TPDM_DSB_TIER        (0x784)
>>>> +#define TPDM_DSB_EDCR(n)    (0x808 + (n * 4))
>>>> +#define TPDM_DSB_EDCMR(n)    (0x848 + (n * 4))
>>>>     /* Enable bit for DSB subunit */
>>>>   #define TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA        BIT(0)
>>>> @@ -34,6 +36,15 @@
>>>>   #define TPDM_DSB_TEST_MODE        GENMASK(10, 9)
>>>>   #define TPDM_DSB_HPSEL        GENMASK(6, 2)
>>>>   +#define EDCRS_PER_WORD                16
>>>> +#define EDCR_TO_WORD_IDX(r)            ((r) / EDCRS_PER_WORD)
>>>> +#define EDCR_TO_WORD_SHIFT(r)        ((r % EDCRS_PER_WORD) * 2)
>>>> +#define EDCR_TO_WORD_VAL(val, r)    (val << EDCR_TO_WORD_SHIFT(r))
>>>> +#define EDCR_TO_WORD_MASK(r)        EDCR_TO_WORD_VAL(0x3, r)
>>>
>>> minor nit: add a new line here please
>> Sure, I will update this in the next patch series.
>>>
>>>> +#define EDCMRS_PER_WORD                32
>>>> +#define EDCMR_TO_WORD_IDX(r)        ((r) / EDCMRS_PER_WORD)
>>>> +#define EDCMR_TO_WORD_SHIFT(r)        ((r) % EDCMRS_PER_WORD)
>>>> +
>>>>   /* TPDM integration test registers */
>>>>   #define TPDM_ITATBCNTRL        (0xEF0)
>>>>   #define TPDM_ITCNTRL        (0xF00)
>>>> @@ -60,14 +71,24 @@
>>>>   #define TPDM_PIDR0_DS_IMPDEF    BIT(0)
>>>>   #define TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB    BIT(1)
>>>>   +#define TPDM_DSB_MAX_LINES    256
>>>> +/* MAX number of EDCR registers */
>>>> +#define TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCR    16
>>>> +/* MAX number of EDCMR registers */
>>>> +#define TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCMR    8
>>>> +
>>>>   /**
>>>>    * struct dsb_dataset - specifics associated to dsb dataset
>>>>    * @mode:             DSB programming mode
>>>> + * @edge_ctrl:        Save value for edge control
>>>> + * @edge_ctrl_mask:   Save value for edge control mask
>>>>    * @trig_ts:          Enable/Disable trigger timestamp.
>>>>    * @trig_type:        Enable/Disable trigger type.
>>>>    */
>>>>   struct dsb_dataset {
>>>>       u32                mode;
>>>> +    u32                edge_ctrl[TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCR];
>>>> +    u32                edge_ctrl_mask[TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCMR];
>>>
>>> minor nit: Please align it with the fields below.
>>
>> Sure, I will update this in the next patch series.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Tao
>>
>>>
>>>>       bool            trig_ts;
>>>>       bool            trig_type;
>>>>   };
>>>
>>> Suzuki
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ