linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for non-NULLable PTR_TO_BTF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230602150112.1494194-2-void@manifault.com>
Date:   Fri,  2 Jun 2023 10:01:12 -0500
From:   David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for non-NULLable PTR_TO_BTF_IDs

In a recent patch, we taught the verifier that trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID can
never be NULL. This prevents the verifier from incorrectly failing to
load certain programs where it gets confused and thinks a reference
isn't dropped because it incorrectly assumes that a branch exists in
which a NULL PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointer is never released.

This patch adds a testcase that verifies this cannot happen.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c        |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c     | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
index cdf4acc18e4c..d89191440fb1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
@@ -70,5 +70,6 @@ void test_cpumask(void)
 		verify_success(cpumask_success_testcases[i]);
 	}
 
+	RUN_TESTS(cpumask_success);
 	RUN_TESTS(cpumask_failure);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index 2fcdd7f68ac7..602a88b03dbc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
 #include "cpumask_common.h"
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -426,3 +427,26 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
+int BPF_PROG(test_refcount_null_tracking, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2;
+
+	mask1 = bpf_cpumask_create();
+	mask2 = bpf_cpumask_create();
+
+	if (!mask1 || !mask2)
+		goto free_masks_return;
+
+	bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, (const struct cpumask *)mask1);
+	bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, (const struct cpumask *)mask2);
+
+free_masks_return:
+	if (mask1)
+		bpf_cpumask_release(mask1);
+	if (mask2)
+		bpf_cpumask_release(mask2);
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.40.1