lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4e090aff64abeca598d1bb6ee54b40ee4ce52858.1685777982.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
Date:   Sat,  3 Jun 2023 16:17:25 +0800
From:   Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
To:     w@....eu
Cc:     falcon@...ylab.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        thomas@...ch.de,
        Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/12] selftests/nolibc: test_fork: fix up duplicated print

running nolibc-test with glibc on x86_64 got such print issue:

    29 execve_root = -1 EACCES                                       [OK]
    30 fork30 fork = 0                                                      [OK]
    31 getdents64_root = 712                                         [OK]

The fork test case has three printf calls:

    (1) llen += printf("%d %s", test, #name);
    (2) llen += printf(" = %d %s ", expr, errorname(errno));
    (3) llen += pad_spc(llen, 64, "[FAIL]\n"); --> vfprintf()

In the following scene, the above issue happens:

    (a) The parent calls (1)
    (b) The parent calls fork()
    (c) The child runs and shares the print buffer of (1)
    (d) The child exits, flushs the print buffer and closes its own stdout/stderr
        * "30 fork" is printed at the first time.
    (e) The parent calls (2) and (3), with "\n" in (3), it flushs the whole buffer
        * "30 fork = 0 ..." is printed

Therefore, there are two "30 fork" in the stdout.

Between (a) and (b), if flush the stdout (and the sterr), the child in
stage (c) will not be able to 'see' the print buffer.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index e68c5692ec54..7dd950879161 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -490,7 +490,13 @@ static int test_getpagesize(void)
 static int test_fork(void)
 {
 	int status;
-	pid_t pid = fork();
+	pid_t pid;
+
+	/* flush the printf buffer to avoid child flush it */
+	fflush(stdout);
+	fflush(stderr);
+
+	pid = fork();
 
 	switch (pid) {
 	case -1:
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ