[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHtENLuHKixK884F@surfacebook>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 16:46:28 +0300
From: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
To: Astrid Rost <astrid.rost@...s.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...s.com,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] iio: light: vcnl4000: add illuminance irq
vcnl4040/4200
Tue, May 30, 2023 at 04:24:02PM +0200, Astrid Rost kirjoitti:
> Add support to configure ambient light sensor interrupts and threshold
> limits for vcnl4040 and vcnl4200. If an interrupt is detected an event
> will be pushed to the event interface.
...
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
What is the purpose of this change?
...
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
Ditto.
...
> int ret;
> struct vcnl4000_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + switch (chan->type) {
Had you run checkpatch.pl? A definition block and a code should be delimited
by a blank line.
...
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
Purpose?
...
> - val = state ? (ret | mask) : (ret & ~mask);
> + val = state ? (ret | mask) : (ret & ~mask);
I'm wondering if you can prepere the code by introducing switch-case instead of
current implementation in the preparatory patch and then do what you want to do
here. It will show much better the change and make review easier.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists