linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/37] 5.15.115-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 3 Jun 2023 16:36:39 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/37] 5.15.115-rc2 review

On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 05:33:12AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/2/23 05:07, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 15:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.115 release.
> > > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > 
> > s390 allmodconfig build fails with the error:
> > 
> > arch/s390/kernel/uv.c: In function 'should_export_before_import':
> > arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:204:40: error: 'mm_context_t' has no member
> > named 'protected_count'
> >    204 |         return atomic_read(&mm->context.protected_count) > 1;
> >        |                                        ^
> > arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:205:1: error: control reaches end of non-void
> > function [-Werror=return-type]
> >    205 | }
> >        | ^
> > 
> 
> Missing commit 07fbdf7f93479 ("KVM: s390: pv: usage counter
> instead of flag"), but I don't know if that alone is sufficient
> (there have been other commits adding to its use).

I've just dropped the offending patches from now, and will wait for
proper backported ones if the s390 people want these added.

greg k-h